Freely subscribe to our NEWSLETTER

Based on a global survey of 1,800 respondents, including 300 in France, the study, The Sustainability Costs of End-of-Life Data, found that for 86% of businesses, environmental sustainability has a high to moderate influence on their approach to processing EOL data. However, more than a third (39%) are yet to implement a plan to reduce their data footprint, leaving them at risk of compliance failures in light of upcoming sustainability regulations.
With a global push for better environmental stewardship from all industries, regulators are cracking down on green efforts that sound impressive but do very little and fall into the greenwashing category. A majority of respondents in France (59%) said they are confident that their organization is reducing the environmental impact of its IT, but more than a third are not.
Our previous report, “Données Stockées à distance,” revealed that for 71% of organizations in France, the switch to the cloud has increased the volume of redundant, obsolete, or trivial (ROT) data they collect. This creates a financial and environmental challenge for businesses, with more than two thirds (68%) of healthcare and financial services organizations concerned about rising energy costs and the impact on storing large quantities of data. Storing more data means using more power and generating more carbon emissions.
This is challenging for financial and healthcare services organizations, as regulation demands that they treat data very carefully. But excess data storage also has a financial and environmental cost, even in the cloud. The pace of cloud migration may be working against companies in these two heavily regulated sectors. Careful consideration must be given to “hidden” sustainability issues such as EOL data.
The study also investigated whether these organizations are measuring their Scope 3 emissions following confirmation of a new standard from the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) which will require disclosure of Scope 3 emissions. There is good news at first glance: 86% of French organizations surveyed are measuring their Scope 3 emissions and more than half (55%) state they ask their partners and suppliers to report on how they reduce their environmental impact. But with the previous report’s findings in mind, slightly less, 53%, ask their cloud provider to report on how they are reducing the environmental impact of cloud storage. Perhaps even more pertinent when considering that 30% of organizations do not trust their cloud provider to appropriately manage EOL data on their behalf.
“While the scale of change required to address the climate crisis may seem daunting, it is an opportunity for ambitious climate action and even competitive differentiation. Businesses in France can’t afford to pay lip service to sustainability with impending regulation coupled with the financial and environmental costs of storing too much data. There are also the significant risks to security created by an ever-expanding attack surface. Incorporating strategies to reduce data footprints that align with sustainability goals and cost reduction must be a matter of priority,” said Yves Gheeraert, Director Benelux, France & South Europe at Blancco.
There are additional effects of improving sustainable practices beyond the need to meet regulatory demands. For example, 42% of respondents believe that investors and customers favor working with sustainable companies and 57% also believe that current and prospective employees favor working for sustainable companies. Further reasons for businesses to look into every part of the business to see where emissions and environmental impact can be reduced.

The report concludes with ways organizations can reduce their data footprint through reductions in ROT data or information that no longer has added benefits, as well as guidance for asset EOL management.